Or "Jacob's Ingenuity""Then Jacob took fresh sticks of poplar and almond and plane trees, and peeled white streaks in them, exposing the white of the sticks.
He set the sticks that he had peeled in front of the flocks in the troughs, that is, the watering places, where the flocks came to drink. And since they bred when they came to drink,
the flocks bred in front of the sticks and so the flocks brought forth striped, speckled, and spotted.
And Jacob separated the lambs and set the faces of the flocks toward the striped and all the black in the flock of Laban. He put his own droves apart and did not put them with Laban's flock.
Whenever the stronger of the flock were breeding, Jacob would lay the sticks in the troughs before the eyes of the flock, that they might breed among the sticks,
but for the feebler of the flock he would not lay them there. So the feebler would be Laban's, and the stronger Jacob's.
Thus the man increased greatly and had large flocks, female servants and male servants, and camels and donkeys. "
Genesis 30:37-43
I’ve had a theory, or my own interpretation of this passage for some time now, but I wanted to do some appropriate research before posting on my blog an application we could glean from this passage. I will state at the outset, I could be wrong, but I think I’m right.
Have you ever wondered how on earth doing what Jacob did had any influence on the mating practices and the offspring of Laban’s flock?
For background context for those unfamiliar with the story, our figure Jacob had decided to leave for his home country after working a number of decades for his father-in-law Laban. They came to an agreement that since Laban was blessed abundantly and prospered as a result of Jacob’s work, that he’d give him something to part with: all the speckled, spotted and black lamb and goat.
To paraphrase, Jacob basically had confidence in his honest work before Laban, but verses later it says Laban went through the flock and took the male goats and lambs who matched the description of the ones he agreed to give Jacob. Laban has consistently ripped Jacob off through out this story as we already read in the chapters previously.
So here’s where we’re at: Jacob takes matters into his own hands yet again, instead of trusting God. Jacob already was destined to get the blessing from his father Isaac, even though he was the second born and not the first, and seems like he had gotten it from his own cunning, but God had planned on giving it to him anyway, despite any efforts he went to to manipulate the circumstances himself.
God often times does things despite us, not because of us.
I believe the Lord did the same thing to Jacob here. The Lord was going to give Jacob the spotted, speckled, striped and dark goats and sheep from Laban’s flock. But then the story mentions this weird detail of what Jacob did to help it to come to pass in his favor.
Months ago, I asked some young ladies at the FIRE Holland Summer School, who I knew had grown up on farms, to explain to me how what Jacob does in this passage would have any bearing on the physical traits of the offspring born, just because they mated in front of these almond sticks with the white exposed on them. They all told me the same thing: “I have no idea why that worked.”
I looked up several commentaries recently for insight into this passage. None of them dealt with how this bore any influence on the physical appearance of the offspring produced. Instead they just said things about our eyes being windows to our soul. But I fail to understand how looking at something while animals are mating will produce specific offspring.
The more I’ve studied this and sought insight into it, the more my opinion and conclusion solidified itself.
Have you ever wondered, when you read this passage how on earth Jacob’s actions manipulated the outcome of the flock’s physical appearance? Do you want to know how pealing almond sticks and placing them by the feeding toughs where these animals mated, is connected to them bringing forth spotted, specked, and striped offspring?
It’s not. There is no connection whatsoever, which is exactly the point.
God had it all under control, through no involvement of Jacob’s human ingenuity. Maybe I’m wrong and someone more familiar with farming and tending flocks could prove to me how this worked, but until then I’m convinced it doesn’t. But the application we can draw from it still applies even if this worked scientifically somehow. I’m not going to be airtight about if this is the case or not, just want to point something out in the way we trust God with our lives. Jacob's life and destiny were in God's hands all along, no matter what Jacob tried doing.
To quote someone who said it better than me:
"It is clear from Ge 31:10-12 that God had instructed Jacob to choose the off-color animals for his wages, but there is no indication that He had instructed him to employ any means to procure the multiplication of such animals. It would appear therefore, that this expedient was nothing less than the evidence of Jacob’s lack of complete faith in God. And what he did is what we ourselves also do. He felt that he must give God some help in the accomplishment of His purposes. God doesn’t need our help, nor is He glorified by it: all He requires of us is a quiet simple faith in His omnipotence."
Jacob stated all we need to know in verse 33: “So my honesty will answer for me later, when you come to look into my wages with you. Every one that is not speckled and spotted among the goats and black among the lambs, if found with me, shall be counted stolen."
Jacob’s actions were not honest when he set about trying to be cunning again in yet another instance where the Lord’s favor was already upon him despite whatever he could try doing to manipulate the circumstances.
How often in our own lives do we try to ‘help God’ when He’s already promised to do something?
Learn to trust God, and things work themselves out without you making them work out.
8 comentarios:
ha. I'm teaching children, and even THEY always wonder how that worked. I used to say: well, apparently by looking at those things, the lambs were born with etc.
Now i might consider telling them that i don't know.
Oh, and agree with your entry. God will do it anyway when it is in His plan...
I like that Steve! Makes total sense...and yes, I had wondered about that too.
The only thing I would ponder further is, does God ever expect/'need' our help in accomplishing His will... and can He possibly be glorified in it? I would answer that indeed He does and can!
An example would be that we know He desires that all men come to the truth and the gospel be preached to the end of the world and then He will return. He chose for this to happen by sending us out His disciples and us.
He promises to provide for us what we need, but we are to 'help' the process, as it were, by going out and looking for a job. We still have to do our resumes, dress up for interviews, apply to openings, etc. Yes, God will accomplish His will in our 'aided' actions.
So, an aside, I could see why Jacob did what he did. He must have thought it would help somehow. Maybe God showed him to do that, but doubt it. His promised inheritance, and his increase in provision still took him doing his part, feeding the animals, protecting them, etc. Is placing sticks that much different in that sense? I think it was foolish but I understand it.
Anyway, my point being that it appears to me that actaully God does want us to 'help' accomplish His promises oftentimes! (Not to say that sometimes too He does stuff totally devoid of our action, which of course He does, due to his grace and good will.) I wish it wasn't that way, but it appears to be so for many of His promises.
-d.
Duncan,
Bro, have you not read my other posts? Of COURSE we have involvement, I just didn't think it was necessary in this post to say the obvious--because I've covered it so many times in several other entries.
Thanks for the reminder, it really still is refreshing in spite of all this hyper-calvinism most of the Church lives by. There's two extremes--and I wasn't actually trying to talk about either one of them in my post.
I agree that God doesn't need our help! :) This post on your blog fits well into a Beth Moore study I'm currently taking through my church.
I wonder about your opinion of Genesis 32: 24-29 where Jacob wrestles with an angel or with God. I've seen these verses interpreted in various ways. I'd be interested to know how you interpret this story.
Was this a physical wrestling match or was it only spiritual? Why did Jacob have to struggle for a blessing?
You may email me at: wendy2lindsey@yahoo.com
Yes, Steve, i suspected that you knew we have to do our part. I just wanted to comment/clarify on some of your sentences for the bennie of those who might have just come here, having not read your other posts in the past.
And, yes, I've read every one for the last 5 months or so! :) I'm hooked.
-d.
It wasn't that long ago that people believed that a mother could "mark" her child if she saw something traumatic while she was pregnant. I've always figured that he was doing his part, to the best of his knowledge, and never thought of it as being unnecessary.
Effective? No!
Needed? Maybe, maybe not.
I guess it depends on how strongly you believe that God helps those who help themselves.
Wendy
Thanks for the encouraging feedback. My aunt bought me a Beth Moore book this past Christ-X, called “Voices of the Faithful” by Moore. I wish I could say I’ve begun it, but I’m still sadly lagging behind in reading of books I began months ago! I’ve just got a lot of reading on my plate.
And sadly, I also have a lot of other things on my plate, and don’t see myself taking the time to do a study or exegesis on the passage you requested. Work, social life and just plain writing of other entries in my drafts folder are pretty much occupying my time.
To answer quickly though, I would say my opinion would be of course Jacob wrestled an angel (or God, or both—whatever) because that’s what the text *says*. There’s no reason to interpret it any other way other than what it says. I know that’s not popular in much of Christendom, but that’s how I approach any Biblical text.
Let me also answer your question somewhat with another question: who is wrestling with whom? Jacob with God, or God with Jacob? I don’t like to put anything in the text it doesn’t say, but verse 24-25 don’t include details that would make this clear for us.
But otherwise, I see no reason to believe this wasn’t a real physical battle.
If you like the late Leonard Ravenhill, go to http://www.ravenhill.org/mp3.htm, and click on “Jacob Meeting with God” video or mp3. I watched this nearly a month ago with my roommate and a friend, and we were all rocked by it. I know he may answer some of your questions in about an hour (and rock your world at the same time!)
---------------------------------------------
Duncan
Glad to see we’re on the same page. If that is how long you’ve been following my blog, then you probably never read my entry right before leaving for Holland called “The Sacred Cow of Being Led by the Spirit.” I don’t know how to put hyperlinks in the comments, so you’ll just have to copy and paste this to your browser. Judging by the feedback I’ve gotten on this entry, I’d suggest others of you give it a read too—like Duncan said, to get a balanced look at this topic in case you’ve only read this entry or are new to reading my blog.
http://fierycanadian.blogspot.com/2005/05/sacred-cow-of-being-led-by-spirit.html
It seems that in evangelical circles, everything is "predestined" and "pre-ordained" and Christians get too comfortable instead of DOING. Then in charismatic circles, gosh, we can't do anything unless we're "led by the Spirit" (which also is not Bible, but the only verse I can think of that phrase being coined was "Jesus was led by the Spirit into the wilderness". We're told repeatedly to have the mind of Christ. What would that look like? Maybe worth considering in another entry at a later date.
------------------------------------------
Dirty Butter
Nice name.
However, “God helps those who help themselves” not only is not in the Bible, but it smacks against the entire concept of “the just shall live by faith” or various other notions in the Bible of how the Lord provides and takes care of his children, and also about putting our trust in Him. It’s one thing to trust Him and rely on Him, it’s something else to take matters into our own hands INSTEAD of trusting him (kinda the jist of what I was writing).
Thanks for the humorous insight about marking children during pregnancy. I also remember it wasn’t that long ago that science began teaching all sorts of weird things, like we came from apes. But that’s for another post. Or hundred.
"Then in charismatic circles, gosh, we can't do anything unless we're "led by the Spirit" (which also is not Bible, but the only verse I can think of that phrase being coined was "Jesus was led by the Spirit into the wilderness". We're told repeatedly to have the mind of Christ. What would that look like? Maybe worth considering in another entry at a later date."
So true... and ye, no doubt you could hash out a good blog post on this!!
I'll read that link. Thx.
Hey, that's a lot of comments. It's funny, one never knows what is going to get comments and what isn't. I suspect sometimes you write some of your entries thinking you are going to get a fare number of comments when you may not transpire, and then other times, like the light hearted 'houses in heaven' post you get a bunch! Wonders never cease.
-d
Publicar un comentario